Ref. DHA-2026 / Maritime Intelligence

When your cargo sits at berth, you need the reason on paper before the next sailing window closes

We chart vessel queues, berth occupancy, and weather-related holds across Busan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and the feeder ports that feed Jeollanam-do exporters. Each briefing names the delay driver, quantifies lost days, and lists practical next steps for your operations desk.

14 Korean ports tracked weekly
48h Standard turnaround on delay reports
2016 Established in Suncheon
Container vessels moored at a Korean port terminal at dusk
Fig. 1 — Gwangyang berth queue, illustrative capture

Where delays cluster on lanes touching Jeollanam-do

Our analysts compile AIS traces, terminal gate logs, and published berth schedules into weekly lane summaries. The panel below reflects typical hold patterns we observed on Northeast Asia–Europe rotations during Q2 sampling.

Average additional waiting days by cause — sampled lanes, Q2 2026

Figures are illustrative aggregates from client briefings. Your report uses vessel-specific data for the shipments you name.

Briefings prepared for freight desks and import managers

Each report type answers a distinct question your team asks when a container misses its connection or a charter party date slips.

Aerial view of container terminal with cranes and stacked containers

Written report with charts · 3–5 business days from data receipt

Port Delay Analysis Report | Dogwood Hub Analytics

A vessel-specific briefing that charts berth queue position, documented hold reasons, and estimated release windows for cargoes stuck at Korean and regional ports.

Read scope →
Shipping containers stacked in a yard with tracking labels visible

Briefing memo with timeline · 2–4 business days

Shipment Visibility Briefing | Dogwood Hub Analytics

A forward-looking lane summary that tracks your cargo from origin gate-out through transshipment hubs, with queue forecasts for the next two sailing cycles.

Read scope →
Cargo ship route planning chart on a navigation table

Analytical review · 7–10 business days

Route Performance Review | Dogwood Hub Analytics

A quarterly retrospective comparing planned versus actual transit times on a lane you specify, with delay attribution by port and carrier segment.

Read scope →

All analysis reports

What operations teams say after receiving a briefing

The Gwangyang berth chart showed us exactly which three vessels ahead of ours were still unloading reefer boxes. We rebooked the inland leg before the demurrage clock moved — saved roughly four days on a citrus shipment bound for Rotterdam.

— Min-jae K., import manager, agricultural cooperative near Yeosu

Clear writing on the feeder misconnect at Busan. I would have liked the customs hold section earlier in the document, but the timeline appendix made it straightforward to brief our Tokyo office.

— Helen W., freight forwarder, Osaka–Busan lane

More client stories →

We map the corridors your cargoes actually sail

From Suncheon-ro to Busan New Port and the trans-Pacific strings that call Gwangyang, our lane sheets list typical transit times, seasonal choke points, and the terminals where we pull live queue data.

Browse trade lanes